Updating inconsistent Description Logic knowledge bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
Finding an appropriate semantics for task of updating an inconsistent knowledge base is a challenging problem. In this paper, we consider knowledge bases expressed in Description Logics, and focus on ABox inconsistencies, i.e., the case where the TBox is consistent, but the whole knowledge base is not. Our first contribution is the definition of a new semantics for updating an inconsistent Description Logic knowledge base with both the insertion and the deletions of a set of ABox assertions. We then concentrate on the DL-Lite family of Description Logics, and present algorithms for updating a possibly inconsistent knowledge base expressed in the most expressive logic of such family. We show that, by virtue of both the characteristics of our semantics, and the limited expressive power of DL-Lite, both insertions and deletions can be done in polynomial time with respect of the size of the ABox.
منابع مشابه
Handling Inconsistency in Knowledge Bases
Real-world automated reasoning systems, based on classical logic, face logically inconsistent information, and they must cope with it. It is onerous to develop such systems because classical logic is explosive. Recently, progress has been made towards semantics that deal with logical inconsistency. However, such semantics was never analyzed in the aspect of inconsistency tolerant relational mod...
متن کاملOn the Evolution of the Instance Level of DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
Recent papers address the issue of updating the instance level of knowledge bases expressed in Description Logic following a modelbased approach. One of the outcomes of these papers is that the result of updating a knowledge base K is generally not expressible in the Description Logic used to express K. In this paper we introduce a formula-based approach to this problem, by revisiting some rese...
متن کاملTowards Agent-Oriented Knowledge Base Maintenance for Description Logic ALCN
Artificial agents functioning in the Semantic Web are to be capable of getting knowledge from diverse sources. This implies the capability to continuously update their knowledge bases. New stream reasoning concepts make this need even more pressing. Semantic Web ontologies are commonly represented using description logic knowledge bases. We propose an agent architecture with such features, util...
متن کاملMinimally inconsistent reasoning in Semantic Web
Reasoning with inconsistencies is an important issue for Semantic Web as imperfect information is unavoidable in real applications. For this, different paraconsistent approaches, due to their capacity to draw as nontrivial conclusions by tolerating inconsistencies, have been proposed to reason with inconsistent description logic knowledge bases. However, existing paraconsistent approaches are o...
متن کاملManaging Inconsistent Possibilistic Knowledge Bases by An Argumentation Approach
Inconsistent knowledge bases usually are regarded as an epistemic hell that have to be avoided at all costs. However, many times it is di cult or impossible to stay away of managing inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we introduce an argumentation-based approach in order to manage inconsistent possibilistic knowledge bases. This approach will be exible enough for managing inconsistent ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012